APPSC Group-2 Mains Exam 2025: Key Insights, 92% Attendance & Controversy Explained

APPSC Group-2 Mains Exam 2025: Key Insights, 92% Attendance & Controversy Explained : The recent APPSC Group-2 Mains Exam has stirred conversations across Andhra Pradesh, capturing the attention of candidates, political stakeholders, and the media. With a striking 92% attendance and controversy over alleged roster system issues, the exam remains a hot topic for discussion. This article delves into the key aspects of the exam, addressing candidate protests, APPSC’s reaction, and detailed scheduling information.

APPSC Group-2 Mains Exam 2025: Key Insights, 92% Attendance & Controversy Explained


Overview of the Exam

The Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission (APPSC) successfully conducted the Group-2 Mains Exam amidst controversy and protest. Here are the highlights:

  • High Attendance: Out of 92,250 applicants, 86,459 candidates downloaded their hall tickets, resulting in a 92% attendance rate.
  • Examination Schedule: The exam was organized across 175 centers in Andhra Pradesh.
  • Political Backdrop: Disputes about the roster system and horizontal reservations for women added to the controversy.

For more details on the official examination process, visit the APPSC Official Website.


Detailed Breakdown of the Controversy

Candidate Protests & Roster System Issues

Some candidates took to the streets, protesting what they perceived as errors in the roster system mentioned in the Group-2 notification. Key points include:

  • Roster System Errors: Allegations arose that mistakes in the roster could affect candidate placement and fairness.
  • Political Angle: The notification was released under the previous YSRCP government, and the opposition Telugu Desam Party (TDP) had earlier supported demands for corrections.
  • High Court Directive: Despite a High Court directive to rectify the roster system, APPSC maintained that the exam would proceed as scheduled.

APPSC’s Official Reaction

In response to the demands for postponement, APPSC provided a clear statement on its stance:

“Postponing the exam would have been unfair to the genuine candidates who worked hard, and it could have given undue advantage to those who did not qualify for the mains exam.”
– APPSC Official Statement

Additional aspects of APPSC’s response include:

  • Adherence to Schedule: The exam was conducted in line with the High Court’s guidance and the mandatory code of conduct for the MLC elections.
  • Suspected Vested Interests: APPSC speculated that coaching centers might be influencing the postponement demands.
  • GO 77 Implementation: The commission clarified that it is following GO 77, which does not permit horizontal reservations for women—a point of contention among some protestors.

Examination Schedule & Key Data

Below is a table summarizing the exam schedule and other relevant details:

Exam Detail Information
Number of Applicants 92,250
Hall Ticket Downloads 86,459
Attendance Rate 92%
Number of Exam Centers 175
Paper 1 Timing 10:00 AM – 12:30 PM
Paper 2 Timing 3:00 PM – 5:30 PM
Notification Release Date December 7, 2023
Posts Available 899

Source: APPSC official announcements and candidate reports.


Understanding the Implications

Why Did Some Candidates Protest?

  • Alleged Roster Errors: Candidates argued that the mistakes in the roster system could lead to unfair treatment.
  • Political Dynamics: The controversy is intertwined with past political decisions made during the previous government’s tenure.
  • Election Pressures: The necessity to adhere to election-related codes of conduct further complicated the scheduling and execution of the exam.

APPSC’s Perspective

APPSC’s decision to proceed with the exam, despite protests, was based on:

  • Fairness to Genuine Candidates: Ensuring that those who had prepared diligently were not disadvantaged.
  • Legal and Procedural Compliance: Following High Court guidelines and the established notification process.
  • Avoiding Unnecessary Delays: Postponement might have favored certain groups, disrupting the merit-based selection process.

Actionable Insights for Candidates

  • Stay Updated: Keep track of official updates on the APPSC Official Website and through verified news sources.
  • Review Exam Notifications: Candidates should read the official notifications carefully, paying special attention to any changes in the roster or exam guidelines.
  • Prepare Accordingly: With 92% attendance, the exam format and schedule are set—ensure you are well-prepared to meet the challenges of the Mains exam.

Quick Checklist for Exam Readiness:

  • Verify your hall ticket download.
  • Note down the exam timings.
  • Review the roster details in the official notification.
  • Stay informed about any further updates or clarifications from APPSC.

Conclusion

The APPSC Group-2 Mains Exam, with its high attendance rate and accompanying controversy over roster system errors, highlights the challenges of balancing administrative protocols with candidate expectations. While protests and political debates continue, APPSC remains steadfast in its decision to conduct the exam as scheduled. This comprehensive overview aims to equip candidates and interested parties with a clear understanding of the situation, actionable insights, and the necessary steps to stay informed.

For further reading on related topics (APPSC Group-2 Mains Exam 2025) and ongoing updates, explore our internal resource on APPSC Exam Analysis and check reputable news sources for the latest information.